Jul 24, 2026SAM.gov has identified and corrected a system error that may have led to incorrectly computed NAICS size standards in the 52.219-1 and 52.212-3 Reps and Certs tables for entity registration renewals submitted from March 24 through July 22, 2026. The potentially affected entities will receive an email with the subject line “Action Required: SAM.gov NAICS Code Size Table Discrepancy” containing specific instructions on the next steps to take.
Jul 15, 2026There is urgent new information about Subcontracting Plan Reporting and assigned roles in SAM.gov. See https://sam.gov/esrss for the latest updates.
DARPA: Closing July 31, 2026
DARPA-SN-26-69 | MXO: NGMM 3D Assembly Design Kit
DARPA’s Next-Generation Microelectronics Manufacturing program is seeking solutions that exercise an early-stage version of the NGMM 3D Assembly Design Kit for mixed-material, three-dimensionally heterogeneously integrated microsystem design using commercial Electronic Design Automation tools.
DARPA-SN-26-83 | MXO: Large-Scale Complex Inorganic Materials
DARPA MXO is seeking new capabilities to grow large-scale, complex inorganic materials at single-crystal quality. Companies must follow the submission instructions included in the DARPA-SN-26-83 attachment on SAM.gov.
Additional Active Notices
DARPA-SN-26-82 | STO: High-Energy Lasers
Closing November 30, 2026
DARPA STO is seeking moderate-power, 1–20 kW high-energy laser solutions capable of operating at a high duty cycle in size, weight and power-constrained systems, including Stryker vehicles and Collaborative Combat Aircraft.
DARPA-SN-26-89 | BTO: Real-Time Cellular Control
Closing December 31, 2026
DARPA BTO is seeking rapidly switchable, non-optogenetic protein domains for real-time cellular control and massless information transfer across cell membranes.
About the ERIS Marketplace
The DARPA Expedited Research Innovation System, or ERIS, provides a streamlined pathway for innovative technology solutions to be assessed, made visible to government customers and positioned for potential award.
Through ERIS, companies submit a seven-minute video pitch describing a specific solution. Solutions assessed as Awardable may then be searched, reviewed and selected by DARPA and other government customers seeking technologies that meet their mission needs.
Review the active Shopping Notices and access ERIS:
Need help preparing your submission?
EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY: DoW Suspends CMMC Phase 2 Requirements
The Pentagon placed an immediate freeze on forthcoming cybersecurity requirements after government research suggested the policy would drive many businesses out of the defense industrial base at a time when the U.S. military urgently needs their innovations.
Defense Department Chief Information Officer Kirsten Davies and Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Michael Duffey unveiled plans Monday to suspend the much-anticipated Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Phase 2 requirements that were set to take effect Nov. 10. A new CMMC Reform Task Force is expected to conduct a review of the entire program and submit a report of its findings and recommendations within the next 60 days.
This major pause comes as contractors have been hustling to obtain third-party assessments of their CMMC compliance in preparation for that near-term enforcement date.
“Every dollar spent on security is a wise dollar spent, and so those who have been forward leaning in uplifting their cyber posture — in assessing what their posture is, and doing something about it — they have contributed to national security,” Davies told a small group of reporters ahead of the official announcement. “That is not money that is spent in vain, and so that is a huge message.”
View the news release: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4542329/forging-the-arsenal-of-freedom-department-of-war-suspends-cmmc-phase-ii-require
|
The 1260H List Just Got a Lot Bigger — Here’s What It Means & What the list actually is
Section 1260H of the FY2021 NDAA requires DoD to publish an annual roster of “Chinese military companies” — firms the government has determined are tied to the People’s Liberation Army, the Central Military Commission, or China’s broader military-civil fusion strategy. Being named on the list isn’t a sanction by itself. It doesn’t block a company from doing business in the U.S. But it does trigger a growing web of downstream consequences, and that web is exactly what’s tightening this year.
Why Does This Update Matter More Than Past Ones?
Two dates matter most right now:
June 30, 2026 — DoD is now prohibited from directly contracting with any entity
on the 1260H list, or with entities they control, for goods, services, or technology.
June 30, 2027 — a broader restriction kicks in, barring DoD from procuring goods or services that involve a listed entity anywhere in the supply chain, even indirectly through a subcontractor.
DoD is barred from contracting with listed biotech firms now automatically swept into the BIOSECURE Act’s “biotechnology company of concern” category, which carries its own separate set of federal procurement restrictions. None of this means a supplier relationship with, say, a component distributor is automatically disqualifying. But it does mean the due-diligence bar just moved, and clients who haven’t thought about it before need to start.
How This Touches Businesses
Most of South Dakota businesses aren’t prime defense contractors trading directly with a company like Huawei. The real exposure is quieter and easier to miss:
Supply chain pass-through. A client’s Tier 2 or Tier 3 supplier — a components vendor, a software subcomponent, an electronics reseller — could have ownership
ties to a newly listed parent company without the client ever realizing it. With names like BYD (batteries, EVs) and TP-Link (networking hardware) now on the list, this is far more likely to show up in ordinary commercial supply chains than it was a year ago.
Flow-down clauses. Clients holding DoD prime contracts or subcontracts should expect these prohibitions to show up in flow-down language soon, if they haven’t already. This is very much in the same family as the CMMC flow-down conversations we’ve already been having with clients.
Grants and cooperative agreements. Clients doing DoD-funded research, or work adjacent to biotechnology, should watch for BIOSECURE Act implementation – a multi-year rollout.
Reputational and banking risk. Several 1260H names are already on OFAC’s Non-SDN Chinese Military-Industrial Complex list or the BIS Entity List. A 1260H designation is often a leading indicator, not the end of the story, so a client’s counterparty risk can keep escalating even after the initial listing.
What Businesses Can Do Right Now
- DoD’s published notice is the source of truth in this case. Businesses are encouraged to check current suppliers against it rather than relying on secondhand summaries. It’s also worth noting that the list changes annually (and sometimes off-cycle, as the withdrawn February 2026 version showed), so a one-time check isn’t enough.
2.Ask the ownership question, not just the name question. Because the rules now reach parent companies and subsidiaries with 50%+ common ownership, a supplier that doesn’t appear on the list by name can still be caught if its parent does appear on the list. This is a good moment to walk through basic ownership-chain due diligence, especially for electronics, batteries, and networking equipment suppliers.
3.Tie it back to existing compliance habits. If a business already has a CMMC flow-down review process or supply chain risk process, 1260H screening is a natural add-on rather than a brand-new program.
4.Flag the timeline, not just the list. The June 30, 2026 direct-contracting ban is already in effect. The June 30, 2027 indirect/supply-chain ban gives businesses a runway to fix problems now instead of scrambling next year.
5.Loop in legal counsel for anything close to the line. Our role is to help clients spot exposure and ask the right questions — determinations about “control” under Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) definitions or contract-specific flow-down language are appropriately a job for your attorney.
WHERE TO GO FOR MORE DETAIL:
HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS KRAMER
Joint ventures in the defense sector are the hot topic these days driven by surging military budgets, raising demand for technology transfer to allies and the mirage of easy money available to U.S. defense companies through the EU Security Action for Europe (SAFE) program seemingly accessible through joint ventures. Governments around the world increasingly seek industrial partnerships with U.S. defense contractors to strengthen domestic manufacturing, expand technology capabilities, and build resilient defense supply chains. During these discussions, one request from the government frequently arises: the creation of a “joint venture” between a U.S. defense company and a local defense company. What Lawyers Mean by a Joint Venture From a corporate law perspective, an equity joint venture generally involves the creation of a jointly owned legal entity through which two or more parties share ownership, governance, capital investment, profits, losses, and strategic decision-making. Such arrangements typically require detailed agreements addressing governance, board composition, intellectual property ownership, financing obligations, dispute resolution, exit rights, and deadlock mechanisms. Many transactions described commercially as “joint ventures” are instead contractual collaborations. These may include teaming agreements, subcontracting arrangements, licensed manufacturing, technology licensing, co-production agreements, maintenance and sustainment partnerships, research collaborations, offset arrangements, or long-term strategic alliances. Although these relationships may be commercially significant and extend for many years, they do not create a jointly owned enterprise. Read more at: e-alerts@millercanfield.com About the AuthorsPawel Chudzicki is the leader of the Aerospace & Defense Practice at Miller Canfield and founder of Washington, D.C. based Miller Canfield Global Strategies. His practice focuses on cross-border corporate transactions, aerospace and defense, Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Direct Commercial Sales, and strategic investments with particular focus on Poland and Qatar. Kevin Dent is a Senior Consultant at Miller Canfield Global Strategies. His practice focuses on international business transactions, offset/industrial participation, national security, and regulatory compliance. Previously he was a Senior International Counsel at Raytheon and prior to that a partner and a major international law firm for over two decades. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rule of Two: OMB Issues Guidance to Increase Small Business Participation on Multiple Award Contracts
On January 25, 2024 the Office of Management and Budget issued guidance on strategies federal agencies should adopt to enable small businesses to participate in multiple-award contracts. This guidance encouraged early engagement and planning for multiple-award contracts to maximize opportunities for small business contract holders; additional consideration of “on-ramps” to allow for businesses to be added during the performance period of the multiple-award contract; and the use of small business set aside orders for competition among small businesses. Read More: OMB Memo
Read More:White House Fact Sheet
Foreign Ownership, Control or Influence (FOCI)
Foreign investment can play an important role in maintaining the vitality of the U.S. industrial base. Therefore, it’s the policy of the U.S. Government to allow foreign investment consistent with the national security interest of the United States. A company is considered to be operating under FOCI whenever a foreign interest has the power, direct or indirect, whether or not exercised, and whether or not exercisable, to direct or decide matters affecting the management or operations of that company in a manner which may result in unauthorized access to classified information or may adversely affect the performance of classified contracts.
Listen: Video One Listen: Video Two
OSBP and DAU brings small business a comprehensive, cost-effective platform of cybersecurity information, resources, tools, and training to assist in achieving and maintaining the intended level of cybersecurity and contractual compliance.
The Project Spectrum Blog: Protecting Small Businesses One Company at a Time is available now on the DAU website and can be retrieved at the following link: https://www.dau.edu/blogs/protecting-small-businesses-one-company-time. The Project Spectrum website is located at this link: https://www.projectspectrum.io/#/
If you are a small business looking to increase sales and profit, reduce dependence on existing markets and stabilize seasonal fluctuations, then you should consider exporting.
Develop your Export Plan & Strategy (all sessions are virtual)
1-hour Pre-Training Session
2-hour Weekly Sessions (4)
1-hour Post-Training Session
Registration: Home | South Dakota Trade
-
The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Public Assistance Program provides supplemental grants to state, tribal, territorial, and local governments, and certain types of private non-profits so that communities can quickly respond to, and recover from, major disasters or emergencies.
-
FEMA also encourages protection of these damaged facilities from future events by providing assistance for hazard mitigation during the recovery process.
For more information on the SD Public Assistance Process, contact your local APEX Accelerator Contracting Specialist (Go To Contact Page, select a county from drop down menu)
South Dakota Department of Transportation Bid Lettings
South Dakota Department of Transportation – (sd.gov)